Location: Dahlonega GA
Posts: 2,462
Club(s): (SEDOC) (DCUK)
eBay selling at it's best I can tell you stock Delorians and quite a bit of slugs so the Turbo is a super nice up-grade.
K-Jet: Causing electrical issues since November 5th 1955
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 3,047
My VIN: 16510 and carbureted
Club(s): (GCD) (SEDOC) (DCUK)
Posts: 434
My VIN: Formerly 10570 and 6776
Club(s): (AZ-D) (DMA) (SCDC) (DCUK)
The latest version of the DMC replacement fuel sender (marked with the letter "A" in the top housing) contains 12 reed switches and one reed switch for the low fuel light that are activated by the float. I had posted photos on the old DMCTalk (RIP). The fluctuations in fuel readings are caused by the fuel flowing quickly in and out of the sender tube. This can be compensated for by plugging the either of the two large holes on the bottom with a tight fitting screw. In some cases, we've filled BOTH and then drilled in 3/32 or smaller hole in the same general vicinity.
We've found that many of the units that when installed do not read "full" or not reading full for very long are simply a result of a combination of either the tank not being *completely* filled (which we don't like to recommend to prevent the boot popping off the top of the tank). Removing the sender from the tank, but leaving it connected and flipping it 180 degrees will show that it will read "full", but the shape of the tank, position of the sender, and the required location of the reed switches don't give the float enough travel to stay at the top switch for very long.
James
Location: Dahlonega GA
Posts: 2,462
Club(s): (SEDOC) (DCUK)
eBay selling at it's best I can tell you stock Delorians and quite a bit of slugs so the Turbo is a super nice up-grade.
K-Jet: Causing electrical issues since November 5th 1955
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 4,740
My VIN: 02613
Club(s): (DCF)
Since Houston has released its new pump/sender all-in-one module, I was wondering if development on the Saab tank sender was going to proceed. For those of us not planning on using the new module, a separate tank level gauge sender will still be necessary.
Quick question: when you say "the sender reads in reverse" from ours, do you mean that its polarity is reversed? If memory serves, that can be easily cured with a single SPDT relay. Or is it something else?
My sending unit (Zilla) seems to be fine, but it never hurts to plan shead...
Thanks,
Farrar
3.0L, automatic, carbureted
I dont think anyone was proceeding on an independent project for the Saab sender. I was (and still am) planning to have it as a user-selectable setting for my electronic instrument cluster since it would be a very minor addition to the programming.
Jim Reeve
DMC6960
D-Status: - Getting some Spring exercise
I have the Zilla unit and I'm happy with the way it works. I did have a few connection issues but those are solved. You will still see a little gauge movement when braking or acceleration but I expect that. Reversing the signal to work with our gauge would just take an op-amp and some resistors. Or better yet a micro could do everything an cure that minor movement.
Dave M vin 03572
http://dm-eng.weebly.com/
THAT'S what I just couldn't remember to ask Sean about at the meet!...
I was looking at a LM107 OpAmp (with a 12V regulator, if needed) and then a 1NA117 Difference Mode Amplifier (Data Sheet Vo=V3-V2 ).
I wanted to measure the units resistance through its range if he still had it.
...Sean?
Dave M vin 03572
http://dm-eng.weebly.com/