I have read this book many times and it can be regarded as factually correct. It is accurate and can't be faulted for any description of major events that affected the company; except for a few minor slips what happened at what time etc. Its fault lies when the writers give opinions of people or events they didn't know or experience, this includes the car.
Looking for more detail on a specific event I read the following passage on page 452 which reflects on how history (the book was first published in 1983) will treat the car. As they say in the best colleges and Universities "discuss":-
"The DMC12 at its best is a low performance counterfeit of better cars and will never be the museum piece of quality its sellers claim today. At its worst individual models are seriously flawed and in some cases may be dangerous."
What do you think about the accuracy of these words.
Nick Sutton