FRAMING JOHN DELOREAN - ON VOD www.framingjohndeloreanfilm.com
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: new front frame extension from DMCH doesn't look right

  1. #11
    LS1 DMC Nicholas R's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  Orlando, Florida

    Posts:    2,734

    My VIN:    01643

    Club(s):   (DCF) (DCO) (DCUK)

    Yea now I'm confused. I installed mine on the 4th of July and had no clearance issues whatsoever.

  2. #12
    Junior Member ebrakespin's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  St. Charles, MO

    Posts:    29

    Sorry I haven't reposted, been really busy. Talked to DMCH and was told that it is a modification they are doing to all the replacement crumple tubes to be cross compatible with RH drive D's. I understand it from a business side they want to reduce the number of parts they stock, but I think I will still reinforce it.

  3. #13
    Senior Member DMC5180's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Reedsburg, WI

    Posts:    4,026

    My VIN:    5180

    Club(s):   (DMWC) (DCUK)

    LHD >8500
    RHD <40 world wide

    DMCH must be planning on doing a lot of RHD conversions going forward. Takes all of 20 minutes to do that modification when needed. Why compromise the structure if you don't need too.
    Last edited by DMC5180; 01-28-2012 at 09:19 PM.
    DENNIS

    VIN 5180, Frame 3652, STAGE II​, DM-eng Solid State Solutions (RPM Rly, Dm.Lt.Mod., Fan Fail Mod. , FAN Rly, HS.Rly) , HID headlights, SPAX user since 2009, Eibach springs, M Adj. Rear LCA's, DPNW poly-sway bar kit, DMCEU LCA Stabilizer link kit, DMCMW Illuminated door sills, Aussie Illuminated SS Shifter plate, REAL MOMO EVO Steering wheel, DELOREANA Extended View Side Mirrors w/ Heaters, DELOREANA LED Door Lights.

  4. #14
    Master Fabricator protodelorean's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Woodbine, MD

    Posts:    182

    My VIN:    02650

    Club(s):   (DMA)

    Quote Originally Posted by ebrakespin View Post
    Sorry I haven't reposted, been really busy. Talked to DMCH and was told that it is a modification they are doing to all the replacement crumple tubes to be cross compatible with RH drive D's. I understand it from a business side they want to reduce the number of parts they stock, but I think I will still reinforce it.
    Definitely. Weld that back in. Looks like an unsafe hack job like that.

  5. #15
    Junior Member ebrakespin's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  St. Charles, MO

    Posts:    29

    I was thinking the same thing as you guys. They offered to try and get me one that was not modified, but I didn't want to go through the headache of sending mine back and waiting. I have been waiting over a decade to get this project going and I'm not letting this hold me back

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date:  Jul 2011

    Posts:    66

    If they want to play hot shot fabricator Jesse James, then why dont they weld in the sway bar reinforcement plates, too? (instead of bolt-in)

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Posts:    3,047

    My VIN:    16510 and carbureted

    Club(s):   (GCD) (SEDOC) (DCUK)

    Wow. And some people consider my intake manifold a hack job.

  8. #18
    Senior Member Kenny_Z's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  Gulf Shores, Al

    Posts:    1,780

    My VIN:    4534

    I wouldn't say hack job. It looks like they contoured it to match the rest of the curves. However, if they haven't welded a reinforcement in that smaller area it is structurally weaker.
    Red
    VIN 4534
    Born - October 1981
    Brought back to life - July 2011

  9. #19
    Senior Member DMC5180's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Reedsburg, WI

    Posts:    4,026

    My VIN:    5180

    Club(s):   (DMWC) (DCUK)

    Hey it is a "Crumple Tube" it's designed to give way. It can just give way a little easier on that side.

    Pragmatically speaking, I doubt it would ever be a significant issue structurally.
    DENNIS

    VIN 5180, Frame 3652, STAGE II​, DM-eng Solid State Solutions (RPM Rly, Dm.Lt.Mod., Fan Fail Mod. , FAN Rly, HS.Rly) , HID headlights, SPAX user since 2009, Eibach springs, M Adj. Rear LCA's, DPNW poly-sway bar kit, DMCEU LCA Stabilizer link kit, DMCMW Illuminated door sills, Aussie Illuminated SS Shifter plate, REAL MOMO EVO Steering wheel, DELOREANA Extended View Side Mirrors w/ Heaters, DELOREANA LED Door Lights.

  10. #20
    LS1 DMC Nicholas R's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  Orlando, Florida

    Posts:    2,734

    My VIN:    01643

    Club(s):   (DCF) (DCO) (DCUK)

    Quote Originally Posted by DMC5180 View Post
    LHD >8500
    RHD <40 world wide

    DMCH must be planning on doing a lot of RHD conversions going forward. Takes all of 20 minutes to do that modification when needed. Why compromise the structure if you don't need too.
    My thoughts exactly. Perhaps something in the RHD conversion creates a high potential for crumple zone failure, haha. New crumple zone with every oil change!

    I still dont quite get where the clearance issue comes in though. How come the LHD cars dont need a cutout?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •