FRAMING JOHN DELOREAN - ON VOD www.framingjohndeloreanfilm.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: What do these cars actually weigh?

  1. #11
    Senior Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Atlanta OTP GA

    Posts:    7,084

    My VIN:    2743

    Club(s):   (SEDOC) (DCH) (DCUK) (DOC-UK)

    Interesting thread.

    Presumably there was a standard weight of an average person in 1981 that they used in their design and it would have been less than 188lb. Possibly 150 or 160 to allow for some luggage. I wonder what number the car companies use today for the average American?

    Would be great to get a BTTF car on these scales too
    Dermot
    VIN 2743, B/A, Frame 2227, engine 2320

    I don't always drive cars, but when I do, I prefer DeLoreans

    http://www.will-to-live.org

    No-one is to stone anyone, even, and I want to make this absolutely clear, even if they do say "carburetor"

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Northern NJ

    Posts:    8,581

    My VIN:    10757 1st place Concourse 1998

    Drilled and ventilated rotors won't help with braking distances, they will just delay the onset of fade. You might consider a more aggressive pad but it will chew up the rotors. The limited slip diff (a quafe) will only help during certain particular driving conditions. About the only time you will encounter such conditions is on a track while racing. IMHO way too expensive for the very limited gain. In fact, with the Quafe, under other different conditions, it can actually make it harder to control. We see this in the Lotus, it has an open diff and some have put the Quafe in and after spending all of that money they do not have a whole lot of good things to say about it. Few will say it was a bad thing, especially after plunking down all of that money! What does make sense is the one piece input shaft. You should also be using Redline MT-90 in the transaxle now. The money spent on the Quafe would be better spent on an advanced driving course like a Skippy course. Learn how to drive better and you don't need the Quafe. It seems you have already made up your mind. Let us know how it works out.
    David Teitelbaum

  3. #13
    DeLorean Taker-Aparter jmettee's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Glen Rock, PA

    Posts:    453

    My VIN:    02075

    Club(s):   (DMA)

    Forgot about replying with my info for a few days. Here's what I weighed on my stock manual with all the "extras" taken out (tools, fire extinguisher, etc) & full of fuel.

    Front 1054 (37.5%)
    Rear 1757 (62.5%)
    Total 2811
    ______________________________________________
    Justin Mettee
    VIN 02075

    DMC-CA cams & custom Flowmaster muffler
    1/4 mile time - 16.792s @ 81.45MPH

  4. #14
    LS1 DMC Nicholas R's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  Orlando, Florida

    Posts:    2,734

    My VIN:    01643

    Club(s):   (DCF) (DCO) (DCUK)

    Quote Originally Posted by David T View Post
    Drilled and ventilated rotors won't help with braking distances, they will just delay the onset of fade. You might consider a more aggressive pad but it will chew up the rotors. The limited slip diff (a quafe) will only help during certain particular driving conditions. About the only time you will encounter such conditions is on a track while racing. IMHO way too expensive for the very limited gain. In fact, with the Quafe, under other different conditions, it can actually make it harder to control. We see this in the Lotus, it has an open diff and some have put the Quafe in and after spending all of that money they do not have a whole lot of good things to say about it. Few will say it was a bad thing, especially after plunking down all of that money! What does make sense is the one piece input shaft. You should also be using Redline MT-90 in the transaxle now. The money spent on the Quafe would be better spent on an advanced driving course like a Skippy course. Learn how to drive better and you don't need the Quafe. It seems you have already made up your mind. Let us know how it works out.
    David Teitelbaum
    The ventilation in the brakes doesn't help the braking, it's the fact that they're 4 piston calipers that helps them. They also have very aggressive wilwood pads to dig into the wilwood discs. The braking is VERY noticeably improved.

    Also I very much disagree about the LSD. The LS1 produces a lot of power, much more than you're used to in a Delorean, and if either tire has a reduction in traction, there is no hesitation before that tire spins freely. It's not a question of my driving ability, it's just physics. In an open differential the power follows the path of least resistance; only takes one wheel. Cliffs car with the 2JZ supra engine has the LSD and it is a truly noticeable difference. Eddy was telling me about when he first did that swap and how he did a 360 in the car after accelerating through a puddle down in FL. After that he knew he needed the LSD. I haven't done any 360s but if definitely felt the traction loss many times. To me the LSD is a very justifiable improvement.
    Last edited by Nicholas R; 01-18-2013 at 11:30 PM.

  5. #15
    Cock Monger thirdmanj's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Posts:    2,517

    All this talk of LSD is very exciting!
    1-800-273-8255

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Northern NJ

    Posts:    8,581

    My VIN:    10757 1st place Concourse 1998

    One big reason in the Lotus's for getting a LSD is if one wheel should lose traction momentarily and then quickly regain it you can get enormous shock loads into the drivertrain. The LSD is supposed to help reduce that. There are things you can do with the suspension that can mitigate the bad effects and I would try some of them first. Getting a LSD only trades some bad traits for others. You will find that out once you get it. The # of pistons all by itself does not change the way the brakes work. It has to do with pressures and that is a function of the sizes of the pistons. 4 small pistons can do what 2 larger ones can do if they are sized accordingly. The composition of the brake pads can have a HUGE effect on braking characteristics. Ventilating and drilling the rotors not so much. Typically the more aggressive the pad the more they will chew up the rotors. Also the most aggressive pads only really get good once they get hot. Till then they really don't 'bite". Not a good trait for a car driven on the street where you may have to do a panic stop on cold brakes.
    David Teitelbaum

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •