content22207
09-16-2011, 07:25 PM
There is a lot of "conventional wisdom" within the DeLorean community that has been accepted as gospel for several decades, and which only recently is being assessed against memories of people who were actually involved in creation and production of these cars. For example:
- The origin of the rear louvers (sunshade)
- The demise of the gas flap hood
It would be nice to have one thread (perhaps stickied) in which other conventional wisdom could be collected and assessed.
I myself would like to know the reason for the last minute increase in the front suspension height. Conventional wisdom is that the front end was raised to meet federal bumper height requirements. 49 CFR Part 581.7 does not support that assumption: http://law.justia.com/cfr/title49/49-6.1.2.3.46.html (NHSTA summary: http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/problems/studies/Bumper/Index.html). If the front suspension was not raised to meet federal standards, why was it raised? All of Lotus' development work was done with the front end significantly lower, as represented on Page A:04:01 of the Workshop Manual.
Bill Robertson
#5939
- The origin of the rear louvers (sunshade)
- The demise of the gas flap hood
It would be nice to have one thread (perhaps stickied) in which other conventional wisdom could be collected and assessed.
I myself would like to know the reason for the last minute increase in the front suspension height. Conventional wisdom is that the front end was raised to meet federal bumper height requirements. 49 CFR Part 581.7 does not support that assumption: http://law.justia.com/cfr/title49/49-6.1.2.3.46.html (NHSTA summary: http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/problems/studies/Bumper/Index.html). If the front suspension was not raised to meet federal standards, why was it raised? All of Lotus' development work was done with the front end significantly lower, as represented on Page A:04:01 of the Workshop Manual.
Bill Robertson
#5939