Quote Originally Posted by mike123 View Post
Why?

I've spent a bit of time researching this thing and never stumbled upon this theory. So now there's one more person who knows where to cast a wider net to try to find one in the wild.
I guess I phrased that poorly in my reply.

What I meant is that I would be hesitant to share a theory like this in such a way that presents it as fact, or could make someone believe that it's confirmed information what the WHE actually is.

The post from jeanmariecannie was quoting a previous question "tell the rest of us what the worm hole emitter is" with the reply "[I] did a page about the history of the WHE for those that may stumble into the thread here". Which sounds more like stating facts than a theory. To be fair, the actual site he linked to doesn't directly say "this is it" but rather uses words like "most likely."

But the fact is, the answer to the question "tell the rest of us what the worm hole emitter is" is still "we don't know for sure." or "has not been confirmed."

Posting potential theories is definitely helpful to those of us that are still searching as it might lead someone to actually find the real deal. So I'm completely on board with that and not discouraging anyone from posting their theories. Just say it's a theory if that's what it is.