FRAMING JOHN DELOREAN - ON VOD www.framingjohndeloreanfilm.com
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Butterfly assembly - removal and lubrication?

  1. #11
    Young Padawan With The DeLorean kings1527's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2012

    Location:  Oak Park, CA

    Posts:    984

    My VIN:    6575

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    Do we know if there is already a write-up on how to remove the butterfly assembly in order to clean it and lube it?

    http://store.delorean.com/p-6395-butterfly-assy.aspx

    I feel my idle stumbles at times because things are not rotating easily enough nor springing back to their rest position. I would like to get in there and clean things up and lube the pivot points of the butterfly valves and throttle linkage as well as the two main springs.

    If someone knows of a step by step process for removal indicating what comes off and in what order, I'd love to look it over. Not likely the hardest thing to figure out, but thought it was worth asking about. Service manual perhaps? Current version with photos would be ideal.
    I did a lot of work on my engine last summer and dealing with the throttle body was one thing. I had a high idle at around 1000-1100 RPM and the culprit turned out to be worn out deceleration springs on the throttle body (Thanks to Dave's recommendation). After I replaced it with a NOS part, my idle as been factory perfect at 750 RPM and never stumbles.

    I did some write ups that might help you along:

    http://delorean6575revisited.blogspo...ater-pump.html
    This one had to do with initially removing it. It's very simple to do and I used the intake manifold removal guide from DMCtalk. That guide is perfect and you'll find links to it in my blog.

    This one has pictures of my bad decel springs and details swapping out the entire unit for the NOS one.
    http://delorean6575revisited.blogspo...-assembly.html

    Alex Abdalla
    6575

    Late 1981, Grey 5-speed, 75k miles. Built 11/11/81

    A stock-look with modern, reliable technology.

    A full restoration with step-by-step "what I did" is in progress at www.delorean6575revisited.blogspot.com

  2. #12
    Senior Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Atlanta OTP GA

    Posts:    7,085

    My VIN:    2743

    Club(s):   (SEDOC) (DCH) (DCUK) (DOC-UK)

    Out of curiousity what sort of mileage was on your car when the spring wore out, so to speak
    Dermot
    VIN 2743, B/A, Frame 2227, engine 2320

    I don't always drive cars, but when I do, I prefer DeLoreans

    http://www.will-to-live.org

    No-one is to stone anyone, even, and I want to make this absolutely clear, even if they do say "carburetor"

  3. #13
    Young Padawan With The DeLorean kings1527's Avatar
    Join Date:  Jun 2012

    Location:  Oak Park, CA

    Posts:    984

    My VIN:    6575

    Quote Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
    Out of curiousity what sort of mileage was on your car when the spring wore out, so to speak
    I was just under 41k miles. My car's underside definitely did not look like a 141k mile car, either. I don't really know what causes them to wear out, particularly at such a relatively low mileage. Engine maladjustment causing excessive backpressure on the springs? I really don't know.

    My recommendation for anyone experiencing the same symptoms would be to look into the decel springs if you've completely ruled out everything else (Idle ECU, vacuum leaks, screw adjustments on the throttle control arm, etc)
    Last edited by kings1527; 05-26-2013 at 04:10 PM. Reason: gramur and speling

    Alex Abdalla
    6575

    Late 1981, Grey 5-speed, 75k miles. Built 11/11/81

    A stock-look with modern, reliable technology.

    A full restoration with step-by-step "what I did" is in progress at www.delorean6575revisited.blogspot.com

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  Aug 2012

    Location:  St. Louis, MO

    Posts:    231

    My VIN:    10084

    Quote Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
    Out of curiousity what sort of mileage was on your car when the spring wore out, so to speak
    Mine had under 20,000 when the springs wore out.
    Michael Todd
    St. Louis

  5. #15
    Senior Member Bitsyncmaster's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Leonardtown, MD

    Posts:    9,614

    My VIN:    03572

    Quote Originally Posted by cybercusp View Post
    Mine had under 20,000 when the springs wore out.
    Mine had 23,000 when I bought it and the springs were bad then. I think it's a defective lot of springs.
    Dave M vin 03572
    http://dm-eng.weebly.com/

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Location:  Sonoma, CA

    Posts:    115

    My VIN:    05287

    +1 for bad de acceleration springs and a high idle here.... 49kmiles

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  Aug 2012

    Location:  St. Louis, MO

    Posts:    231

    My VIN:    10084

    Quote Originally Posted by Bitsyncmaster View Post
    Mine had 23,000 when I bought it and the springs were bad then. I think it's a defective lot of springs.
    I agree. I can't imagine a spring rate would go out of spec just due to age, barring oxidation/thermal cycling, etc?
    Michael Todd
    St. Louis

  8. #18
    EFI DeLorean dmc6960's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Minnesota

    Posts:    1,590

    My VIN:    06960

    My 100,000+ mile springs were perfect before I removed them. I'd agree on the "bad lot" theory.
    Jim Reeve
    DMC6960

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date:  Jun 2011

    Posts:    4,862

    My VIN:    3937

    I've thought of that bad lot theory on a few other things within the car too. TABs come to mind. Although each time you start looking at it, you see quite the wide range of VINs for the people having the problems. The spring one here for example, has 3000, 5000, and 10,000 VINs which is a fairly wide range. Not necessarily that many months apart, but quite a few cars. We know Dunmurry didn't do everything super organized or "in order" (kind of like the matching numbers conversation), but you would have thought if they got a bad batch of something, and it was a box of 500 of that particular part, they would have used them on successive cars before opening up the next box of 500 parts. Hard to figure out what the guys were doing back in 1981... if only I had a time machine...


    Sept. 81, auto, black interior

  10. #20
    Senior Member Bitsyncmaster's Avatar
    Join Date:  May 2011

    Location:  Leonardtown, MD

    Posts:    9,614

    My VIN:    03572

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    I've thought of that bad lot theory on a few other things within the car too. TABs come to mind. Although each time you start looking at it, you see quite the wide range of VINs for the people having the problems. The spring one here for example, has 3000, 5000, and 10,000 VINs which is a fairly wide range. Not necessarily that many months apart, but quite a few cars. We know Dunmurry didn't do everything super organized or "in order" (kind of like the matching numbers conversation), but you would have thought if they got a bad batch of something, and it was a box of 500 of that particular part, they would have used them on successive cars before opening up the next box of 500 parts. Hard to figure out what the guys were doing back in 1981... if only I had a time machine...
    From what I have seen, it's always both springs are bad and you can tell they are bad just by looking at them. All the photos of bad springs show the same two or three coils that are spaced wider than the rest of the coils.
    Dave M vin 03572
    http://dm-eng.weebly.com/

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •